E-Government Research Analyzed Through Social Network Perspective: Patterns, Trends, and Future Directions

Authors

  • Nur Inzana Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton Author
  • Anwar Sadat Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton Author

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of e-government research from a social network theory perspective. By systematically reviewing existing literature, it uncovers prevailing patterns and emerging trends that characterize the intersection of e-government initiatives and social networks. The study highlights how social network structures influence the adoption, implementation, and success of e-government services, emphasizing the role of connectivity, collaboration, and information exchange among stakeholders. Furthermore, it identifies gaps in current research and proposes future directions to advance understanding in this evolving field. This paper explores the evolving landscape of e-government research through the lens of social network analysis, uncovering key patterns, emerging trends, and prospective future directions. VOSviewer software is used to map the relationships between themes, authors, affiliations, and global research trends. The results show that e-government publications fluctuate, with the highest peak in 2022 before declining significantly in 2025. Analysis of the distribution of published themes shows that e-government is a multidisciplinary field. EGDI analysis confirms the consistency of countries such as Denmark, South Korea, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, and Singapore in achieving top rankings through inclusive policy support, digital infrastructure, and quality human resources. Therefore, this study recommends that future e-government development focus on fostering cross-disciplinary research by strengthening international collaboration. Furthermore, cross-country policy comparisons are crucial for strengthening transparent, participatory, and sustainable digital governance.

References

Abdulkareem, A. K. (2024). E-Government in Nigeria Can Generative AI Serve as a Tool for Civic Engagement? Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 9(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.7068

Adams, S. O., & Paul, C. (2023). E-government development indices and the attainment of United Nations sustainable development goals in Africa: A cross-sectional data analysis. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/13576

Agbozo, E., & Asamoah, B. K. (2019). The role of e-government systems in ensuring government effectiveness and control of corruption. R-Economy, 5(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2019.5.2.006

Ahmad, N., Waqas, M., & Zhang, X. (2021). Public Sector Employee Perspective towards Adoption of E-Government in Pakistan: A Proposed Research Agenda. Data and Information Management, 5(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2020-0029

Akbar, P., Nurmandi, A., Irawan, B., & Loilatu, M. J. (2022). Research Trends in E- Government Interoperability: Mapping Themes and Concepts Based on The Scopus Database. EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 14(2), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v14i2.707

Androniceanu, A., & Georgescu, I. (2021). E-Government in European Countries, a Comparative Approach Using the Principal Components Analysis. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(2), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2021-0015

Androniceanu, A., & Georgescu, I. (2023). Hierarchical Clustering of the European Countries from the Perspective of E-government, E-participation, and Human Development. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 16(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2023-0011

Baharuddin, T., Qodir, Z., & Loilatu, M. J. (2022). Government Website Performance during Covid-19 : Comparative Study Yogyakarta and South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 9(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v9i2.11474

Bokšová, J., Bokša, M., Horák, J., Pavlica, K., Strouhal, J., & Šaroch, S. (2021). E-government services and the digital divide: A quantitative analysis of the digital divide between the general public and internet users. Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy, 9(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.18080/JTDE.V9N1.301

Chen, Y., & Li, Q. (2024). The Impact of E-Government on the New Generation Productive Capacities: Evidence from Cross-Country Data. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083233

Chohan, S. R., & Hu, G. (2022). Strengthening digital inclusion through e-government: cohesive ICT training programs to intensify digital competency. Information Technology for Development, 28(1), 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2020.1841713

de Melo Santos, N. D. M., & de Souza, E. C. L. (2021). Evolution and trend of studies on e-government: Mapping the area- from 1992 to 2018. Revista de Administracao Publica, 55(5), 1124–1148. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220200582

Dias, G. P. (2019). Fifteen years of e-government research in Ibero-America: A bibliometric analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 400–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.008

Djatmiko, G. H., Sinaga, O., & Pawirosumarto, S. (2025). Digital Transformation and Social Inclusion in Public Services: A Qualitative Analysis of E-Government Adoption for Marginalized Communities in Sustainable Governance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072908

Effiong, U. E., & Okijie, S. R. (2021). Governance and Economic Development in the 21ST Century : Empirical Evidence from Selected West African Countries. 1(3).

Elmatsani, H. M., Widianingsih, I., Nurasa, H., Munajat, M. D. E., & Suwanda, S. (2024). Exploring the evolution of leadership in government: a bibliometric study from e- government era into the digital age. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2414877

Fisdian Adni, D., Rusadi, S., & Baharuddin, T. (2024). Adaptive Policy in Website-Based Digitization of Government Public Services: A Thematic Analysis. Journal of Local Government Issues, 7(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v7i1.29404

Ibrahim, A. H. H., Baharuddin, T., & Wance, M. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of E-Government and Trust : A Lesson for Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 19(3), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v19i3.1303

Isabella, Agustian, E., Baharuddin, T., & Ibrahim, A. H. H. (2025). Bridging E-Government With Digital Literacy: a Literature Review. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 14(1 (special issue)), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv14i1siart12

Isabella, Alfitri, Saptawan, A., Nengyanti, & Baharuddin, T. (2024). Empowering Digital Citizenship in Indonesia : Navigating Urgent Digital Literacy Challenges for Effective Digital Governance. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 11(2), 142–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v11i2.19258

Işık, C., Aydın, E., Dogru, T., Rehman, A., Sirakaya-Turk, E., & Karagöz, D. (2022). Innovation Research in Tourism and Hospitality Field: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137889

Lytras, M. D., & Şerban, A. C. (2020). E-Government Insights to Smart Cities Research: European Union (EU) Study and the Role of Regulations. IEEE Access, 8, 65313–65326. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982737

Marysyuk, K. B., Tomchuk, I. O., Denysovskyі, M. D., Geletska, I. O., & Khutornyi, B. V. (2021). ‘Diia. digital state’ and E-Government practices as anti-corruption tools in Ukraine. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 17, 885–897. https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2021.17.83

Mensah, I. K. (2019). Factors Influencing the Intention of University Students to Adopt and Use E-Government Services: An Empirical Evidence in China. SAGE Open, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019855823

Mkude, C. (2023). Open Innovation in E-government: Exploring its Practices in Tanzania. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3571822

Mostafa, M. M., & El-Masry, A. A. (2013). Citizens as consumers: Profiling e-government services’ users in Egypt via data mining techniques. International Journal of Information Management, 33(4), 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.03.007

Mukminto, E., Martitah, M., Damayanti, R., & Wedhatami, B. (2023). Public Services Versus Covid-19: Participation of Villagers in Public Service based on E-Government in Pandemic. Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15294/jphi.v6i1.60650

Nadhira, R., Hamdi, H., Putri, S. A. E., & Ervi, T. S. (2024). Enhancing citizen satisfaction and loyalty in e-government: Lessons learned from Jakarta COVID-19 website. Information Services and Use, 44(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-240229

Nielsen, M. M., & Ali, W. K. M. (2021). Governing and Monitoring the Digital Transformation: Assessing the Qatari Experience since 2003. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494193.3494227

Noor, M. (2022). The effect of e-service quality on user satisfaction and loyalty in accessing e-government information. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(3), 945–952. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.2.002

Pisár, P., Priščáková, S., Špaček, D., & Nemec, J. (2022). Digitization as a tool of e-government in selected public services of the state: international comparison of Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Administratie Si Management Public, 2022(39), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2022.39-07

Prabawa, W. G., Mutiarin, D., Purnomo, E. P., & Roengtam, S. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis in the Development of Public Sector Digitalization. 11(2), 114–126.

Quintana, A. G., Urquía-Grande, E., & Delgado Jalón, M. L. (2022). Strategic Conceptual Theories and Sustainable Cooperation Among Stakeholders in E-government, E- participation, and Social Media. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 16(2), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2022-0007

Ravšelj, D., Umek, L., Todorovski, L., & Aristovnik, A. (2022). A Review of Digital Era Governance Research in the First Two Decades: A Bibliometric Study. Future Internet, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14050126

Rusch, G. M., Bartlett, J., Kyrkjeeide, M. O., Lein, U., Nordén, J., Sandvik, H., & Stokland, H. (2022). A joint climate and nature cure: A transformative change perspective. Ambio, 51(6), 1459–1473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01679-8

Singh, S., Kumar, V., Paliwal, M., Verma, P., & Rajak, B. (2022). A citizen-centric approach to understand the effectiveness of e-government web portals: Empirical evidence from India. Information Polity, 27(4), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-220001

Smirnova, N. (2020). E-government and social media in Ukraine: global challenges for legal regulations. Lex Portus, 1(21), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.1.2020.5

Sussy, B.-O., & Vicente, M. L. (2021). E-government and e-services in local government: A case study. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 17, 732–739. https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2021.17.70

Tejedo-Romero, F., Araujo, J. F. F. E., Tejada, Á., & Ramírez, Y. (2022). E-government mechanisms to enhance the participation of citizens and society: Exploratory analysis through the dimension of municipalities. Technology in Society, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101978

Tolossa, G., & Melese, W. E. (2024). Revisiting determinants of tax revenue mobilization in Sub-Saharan African countries: does e-government matter? Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2399937

Uwizeyimana, D. E. (2022). Analysing the importance of e-government in times of disruption: The case of public education in Rwanda during Covid-19 lockdown. Evaluation and Program Planning, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102064

Weigl, L., Roth, T., Amard, A., & Zavolokina, L. (2024). When public values and user- centricity in e-government collide – A systematic review. Government Information Quarterly, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101956

Włodyka, E. M. (2024). Implementation of e-Government and Artificial Intelligence in Polish Public Administration. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 14(2), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2024-0019

Wu, A. M., Yan, Y., & Vyas, L. (2020). Public sector innovation, e-government, and anticorruption in China and India: Insights from civil servants. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(3), 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12439

Zambrano-Yépez, C., Guillén-Rodríguez, Y., & Henríquez-Coronel, P. (2023). Multivariate analysis of the determinants of e-government. Administratie Si Management Public, 2023(40), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2023.40-08

Zeebaree, M., Agoyi, M., & Aqel, M. (2022). Sustainable Adoption of E-Government from the UTAUT Perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095370

Downloads

Published

19-03-2026

How to Cite

E-Government Research Analyzed Through Social Network Perspective: Patterns, Trends, and Future Directions. (2026). Citizen and Government Review, 3(1), 240-252. https://cjrjournal.com/index.php/cgr/article/view/28